arXiv
Abstract
Classical spatial models predict platform convergence, yet empirical polarization persists. This paper proposes a non-electoral mechanism: lobbying as a monopsonistic market for legislative support. Here, extreme benefactors must pay more to attract distant politicians, creating a rent gradient that rewards platform differentiation. We find that the unique equilibrium places politicians at $(\frac{1}{4},\frac{3}{4})$ for any monotone policy-production cost. Thus, polarization can arise solely from lobbying-market structure, independent of electoral incentives.
AI Summary - The paper does not provide empirical evidence to support its claims and relies on theoretical analysis only. [3]
- The paper presents a model of political polarization in the United States, focusing on the role of interest groups and lobbying in shaping party positions. [2]
- The model suggests that the quartering equilibrium is a stable outcome, which may explain why parties in the United States have become more polarized over time. [1]
Krklareli University
Abstract
This study analyzes the impacts of economic growth on ecosystem in Turkiye. The study uses annual data for the period 1995-2021 and the ARDL method. The study utilizes the Ecosystem Vitality Index, a sub-dimension of the Environmental Performance Index. In addition, seven models were constructed to assess in detail the impact of economic growth on different dimensions of the ecosystem. The results show that economic growth has a significant impact in all models analyzed. However, the direction of this impact differs across ecosystem components. Economic growth is found to have a positive impact on agriculture and water resources. In these models, a 1% increase in GDP increases the agriculture and water resources indices by 0.074-0.672%. In contrast, economic growth has a negative impact on biodiversity and habitat, ecosystem services, fisheries, acid rain and total ecosystem vitality. In these models, a 1% increase in GDP reduces the indices of biodiversity and habitat, ecosystem services, fisheries, acid rain and total ecosystem vitality by 0.101-2.144%. The results suggest that the environmental costs of economic growth processes need to be considered. Environmentally friendly policies should be combined with sustainable development strategies to reduce the negative impacts of economic growth.
AI Summary - Economic growth has a complex impact on ecosystems, with both positive and negative effects. [3]
- GDP has a negative impact on biodiversity, ecosystem services, fisheries, acid rain, and total ecosystem vitality. [3]
- The study's findings are consistent with previous research on the impacts of economic growth on the environment. [3]
- Economic growth: The increase in the production of goods and services within an economy over a specific period of time. [3]
- Energy intensity: The amount of energy consumed per unit of GDP or other economic indicator. [3]
- Trade: The exchange of goods and services between countries. [3]
- Energy intensity, population density, and trade have a negative impact on environmental indicators. [2]