Why we think this paper is great for you:
This paper provides a systematic framework for modern data engineering, offering insights into advanced ETL/ELT patterns crucial for optimizing data workflows. You will find its focus on scalability and real-time processing highly valuable for your data infrastructure initiatives.

Abstract
Traditional ETL and ELT design patterns struggle to meet modern requirements of scalability, governance, and real-time data processing. Hybrid approaches such as ETLT (Extract-Transform-Load-Transform) and ELTL (Extract-Load-Transform-Load) are already used in practice, but the literature lacks best practices and formal recognition of these approaches as design patterns. This paper formalizes ETLT and ELTL as reusable design patterns by codifying implicit best practices and introduces enhanced variants, ETLT++ and ELTL++, to address persistent gaps in governance, quality assurance, and observability. We define ETLT and ELTL patterns systematically within a design pattern framework, outlining their structure, trade-offs, and use cases. Building on this foundation, we extend them into ETLT++ and ELTL++ by embedding explicit contracts, versioning, semantic curation, and continuous monitoring as mandatory design obligations. The proposed framework offers practitioners a structured roadmap to build auditable, scalable, and cost-efficient pipelines, unifying quality enforcement, lineage, and usability across multi-cloud and real-time contexts. By formalizing ETLT and ELTL, and enhancing them through ETLT++ and ELTL++, this work bridges the gap between ad hoc practice and systematic design, providing a reusable foundation for modern, trustworthy data engineering.

AI Summary

• Formalization of ETLT and ELTL as distinct hybrid design patterns provides a structured approach to reconciling operational trade-offs in modern data environments, such as compute locality, raw data retention, and governance alignment. [2]
• ETLT++ introduces mandatory data contracts at ingress, ensuring early validation and quarantining of non-compliant data based on hard rules, thereby preventing corrupted data propagation into downstream systems. [2]
• ELTL++ mandates managed raw layer storage with metadata-driven ingestion, retention, and tiering policies, effectively combating 'data swamps' and optimizing storage costs by moving older data to colder tiers. [2]
• Both ETLT++ and ELTL++ enforce versioned, append-only loading, guaranteeing full data lineage, auditability, and the ability to reproduce historical analyses by allowing 'time-travel' through dataset states. [2]
• The proposed patterns embed continuous monitoring, semantic curation, and rewindable business logic, transforming ad-hoc data pipelines into reliable, transparent, and auditable systems with measurable service-level objectives. [2]
• The framework addresses the industry-academia gap by providing systematic, reusable design patterns for complex enterprise data challenges, moving beyond isolated theoretical optimizations to practical, operationalizable solutions. [2]
• ETLT (Extract-Transform-Load-Transform): A multi-stage integration paradigm that decouples data quality operations (T1) from business-specific transformations (T2), with an intermediate load stage. [2]
• ELTL (Extract-Load-Transform-Load): A dual-loading architecture that emphasizes preservation of raw data (L1) alongside performance-optimized outputs (L2) after a comprehensive transformation stage. [2]
• ETLT++: An enhanced ETLT pattern incorporating mandatory data contracts, versioned raw storage, rewindable business logic, and continuous monitoring as explicit design obligations. [2]
• ELTL++: An enhanced ELTL pattern featuring smart raw data management (L1), standardized and versioned transformations, dual loading with a curated semantic layer, and embedded governance and observability. [2]

Why we think this paper is great for you:
This vision paper on Generative AI in Software Engineering offers forward-looking perspectives on integrating AI across the development lifecycle. It will be highly relevant for understanding the strategic impact of AI on your engineering practices and future planning.

Abstract
Generative AI (GenAI) has recently emerged as a groundbreaking force in Software Engineering, capable of generating code, suggesting fixes, and supporting quality assurance. While its use in coding tasks shows considerable promise, applying GenAI across the entire Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) has not yet been fully explored. Critical uncertainties in areas such as reliability, accountability, security, and data privacy demand deeper investigation and coordinated action. The GENIUS project, comprising over 30 European industrial and academic partners, aims to address these challenges by advancing AI integration across all SDLC phases. It focuses on GenAI's potential, the development of innovative tools, and emerging research challenges, actively shaping the future of software engineering. This vision paper presents a shared perspective on the future of GenAI-based software engineering, grounded in cross-sector dialogue and experience within the GENIUS consortium, supported by an exploratory literature review. The paper explores four central elements: (1) a structured overview of current challenges in GenAI adoption across the SDLC; (2) a forward-looking vision outlining key technological and methodological advances expected over the next five years; (3) anticipated shifts in the roles and required skill sets of software professionals; and (4) the contribution of GENIUS in realizing this transformation through practical tools and industrial validation. By aligning technical innovation with business relevance, this paper aims to inform both research agendas and industrial strategies, providing a foundation for reliable, scalable, and industry-ready GenAI solutions for software engineering teams.

Why we think this paper is great for you:
This paper offers practical strategies for implementing continuous engineering in complex organizational settings, even when traditional continuous delivery is challenging. Its insights into navigating organizational constraints will be directly applicable to managing your engineering teams effectively.

Abstract
Purpose: Continuous Software Engineering (CSE) promises improved efficiency, quality, and responsiveness in software-intensive organizations. However, fully adopting CSE is often constrained by complex products, legacy systems, organizational inertia, and regulatory requirements. In this paper, we examine four industrial cases from the automation, automotive, retail, and chemical sectors to explore how such constraints shape CSE adoption in practice. Methods: We apply and extend a previously proposed CSE Industry Readiness Model to assess the current and potential levels of adoption in each case. Through expert interviews and narrative synthesis, we identify common driving forces and adoption barriers, including organizational preparedness, cross-organizational dependencies, and limited customer demand for continuous delivery. Results: Based on our findings, we propose an updated readiness model that introduces additional levels of internal and external feedback, distinguishes market- and organization-facing constraints, and better guides practitioners in setting realistic CSE adoption goals. Conclusions: Our results highlight that while full end-to-end CSE adoption may not always be feasible, meaningful internal improvements are still possible and beneficial. This study provides empirically grounded guidance for organizations navigating partial or constrained CSE transformations.

Why we think this paper is great for you:
You will appreciate this paper's exploration of a multi-agent AI framework for autonomous engineering design, which promises to enhance efficiency and collaboration. It directly addresses how AI can transform and optimize complex engineering processes.

Abstract
The engineering design process often demands expertise from multiple domains, leading to complex collaborations and iterative refinements. Traditional methods can be resource-intensive and prone to inefficiencies. To address this, we formalize the engineering design process through a multi-agent AI framework that integrates structured design and review loops. The framework introduces specialized knowledge-driven agents that collaborate to generate and refine design candidates. As an exemplar, we demonstrate its application to the aerodynamic optimization of 4-digit NACA airfoils. The framework consists of three key AI agents: a Graph Ontologist, a Design Engineer, and a Systems Engineer. The Graph Ontologist employs a Large Language Model (LLM) to construct two domain-specific knowledge graphs from airfoil design literature. The Systems Engineer, informed by a human manager, formulates technical requirements that guide design generation and evaluation. The Design Engineer leverages the design knowledge graph and computational tools to propose candidate airfoils meeting these requirements. The Systems Engineer reviews and provides feedback both qualitative and quantitative using its own knowledge graph, forming an iterative feedback loop until a design is validated by the manager. The final design is then optimized to maximize performance metrics such as the lift-to-drag ratio. Overall, this work demonstrates how collaborative AI agents equipped with structured knowledge representations can enhance efficiency, consistency, and quality in the engineering design process.

Why we think this paper is great for you:
This paper introduces Kosmos, an AI scientist for autonomous discovery, which aligns with advanced applications of AI in data-driven scientific research. It offers a glimpse into the future of AI agents automating complex data analysis and hypothesis generation.

Abstract
Data-driven scientific discovery requires iterative cycles of literature search, hypothesis generation, and data analysis. Substantial progress has been made towards AI agents that can automate scientific research, but all such agents remain limited in the number of actions they can take before losing coherence, thus limiting the depth of their findings. Here we present Kosmos, an AI scientist that automates data-driven discovery. Given an open-ended objective and a dataset, Kosmos runs for up to 12 hours performing cycles of parallel data analysis, literature search, and hypothesis generation before synthesizing discoveries into scientific reports. Unlike prior systems, Kosmos uses a structured world model to share information between a data analysis agent and a literature search agent. The world model enables Kosmos to coherently pursue the specified objective over 200 agent rollouts, collectively executing an average of 42,000 lines of code and reading 1,500 papers per run. Kosmos cites all statements in its reports with code or primary literature, ensuring its reasoning is traceable. Independent scientists found 79.4% of statements in Kosmos reports to be accurate, and collaborators reported that a single 20-cycle Kosmos run performed the equivalent of 6 months of their own research time on average. Furthermore, collaborators reported that the number of valuable scientific findings generated scales linearly with Kosmos cycles (tested up to 20 cycles). We highlight seven discoveries made by Kosmos that span metabolomics, materials science, neuroscience, and statistical genetics. Three discoveries independently reproduce findings from preprinted or unpublished manuscripts that were not accessed by Kosmos at runtime, while four make novel contributions to the scientific literature.

Why we think this paper is great for you:
Building on the concept of AI scientists, this paper delves into autonomous scientific exploration and its associated risks. Understanding the capabilities and trustworthiness of such systems will be important for your strategic oversight of AI initiatives.

Abstract
Understanding the current capabilities and risks of AI Scientist systems is essential for ensuring trustworthy and sustainable AI-driven scientific progress while preserving the integrity of the academic ecosystem. To this end, we develop Jr. AI Scientist, a state-of-the-art autonomous AI scientist system that mimics the core research workflow of a novice student researcher: Given the baseline paper from the human mentor, it analyzes its limitations, formulates novel hypotheses for improvement, validates them through rigorous experimentation, and writes a paper with the results. Unlike previous approaches that assume full automation or operate on small-scale code, Jr. AI Scientist follows a well-defined research workflow and leverages modern coding agents to handle complex, multi-file implementations, leading to scientifically valuable contributions. For evaluation, we conducted automated assessments using AI Reviewers, author-led evaluations, and submissions to Agents4Science, a venue dedicated to AI-driven scientific contributions. The findings demonstrate that Jr. AI Scientist generates papers receiving higher review scores than existing fully automated systems. Nevertheless, we identify important limitations from both the author evaluation and the Agents4Science reviews, indicating the potential risks of directly applying current AI Scientist systems and key challenges for future research. Finally, we comprehensively report various risks identified during development. We hope these insights will deepen understanding of current progress and risks in AI Scientist development.

Why we think this paper is great for you:
This paper discusses automated workflows and research data management, which could offer some transferable insights into managing complex data systems. While the domain is specific, the principles of data integration and workflow automation may still be of interest.

Abstract
Defect phase diagrams provide a unified description of crystal defect states for materials design and are central to the scientific objectives of the Collaborative Research Centre (CRC) 1394. Their construction requires the systematic integration of heterogeneous experimental and simulation data across research groups and locations. In this setting, research data management (RDM) is a key enabler of new scientific insight by linking distributed research activities and making complex data reproducible and reusable. To address the challenge of heterogeneous data sources and formats, a comprehensive RDM infrastructure has been established that links experiment, data, and analysis in a seamless workflow. The system combines: (1) a joint electronic laboratory notebook and laboratory information management system, (2) easy-to-use large-object data storage, (3) automatic metadata extraction from heterogeneous and proprietary file formats, (4) interactive provenance graphs for data exploration and reuse, and (5) automated reporting and analysis workflows. The two key technological elements are the openBIS electronic laboratory notebook and laboratory information management system, and a newly developed companion application that extends openBIS with large-scale data handling, automated metadata capture, and federated access to distributed research data. This integrated approach reduces friction in data capture and curation, enabling traceable and reusable datasets that accelerate the construction of defect phase diagrams across institutions.